Why Employee Wellness
Employee health promotion programs are based on the theory that
it costs less to educate workers about health risks than to pay
for the cost of ill health and disease. The following benefits
from in-house employee fitness and wellness programs have been
demonstrated.
- Decreased absenteeism
- Decrease employee turnover
- Reduced health care claims
- Decreased musculoskeletal injuries
- Increased organizational effectiveness
- Return on investment
Absenteeism
- Over a ten-year period, The Canada Life Assurance Company
showed that active employees decreased their absenteeism by
23.5%.
- Evaluation of a comprehensive program at General Mills showed
a decrease in absenteeism by 19%.
- Dupont Corporation examined the effect of its comprehensive
health promotion program on absence among workers. After 2 years,
they demonstrated a 14% decline in disability days versus 5.8%
in the control group.
- A nationwide survey of 8,301 employees showed an inverse relationship
between absenteeism and fitness. Employees in the lowest fitness
categories had 2.5 times the rate of extended sick leave compared
to employees in the highest fitness categories.
Decreased Employee Turnover
- The Canada Life Assurance Company in Toronto found that employee
turnover among program participants has been sustained at an
8% advantage compared to program dropouts.
- Tenneco found that those who did not participate in its corporate
fitness program were 13% less likely to stay with the company.
- Gettman reported a turnover rate twice as high in sedentary
employees as compared to physically active employees.
Reduced Health Care Claims
- Employee members of the GE Aircraft Engine's Fitness Centre
in Cincinnati, had $540,000 less in medical costs compared to
non-members.
- The Bank of America conducted a simplified health promotion
program for $30 per person. Insurance claims were reduced an
average of $164 per year in the intervention group, while costs
increased $15 for the control group.
- Prudential Insurance reports that the company's major medical
costs dropped from $574 to $312 for each participant in its
wellness program.
- Wellness is optimizing health - therefore is used to describe
all health promotion, fitness and other wellness programming
Reduced Musculoskeletal Injuries
- A study was conducted on 10,350 full-time regular employees
who worked at Shell Oil to investigate musculoskeletal injuries.
Findings suggest it is possible to reduce the impact of these
injuries through implementation of an integrated injury prevention
program which includes support for personal fitness programs.
- Of all Workers' Compensation Claims filed in the Province
of Ontario in 1992, more than 50% were related to musculoskeletal
injuries (sprains and strains). Of all the musculoskeletal injuries
documented, 34% were due to back pain.
Increased Organizational Effectiveness
- At Canada Life, regular participants in the on-site fitness
program scored significantly higher than the inactive groups
in their attitudes towards co-workers, supervisors and work.
- Holzbach and others reported in the Journal of Occupational
Medicine, a two-year study in which seven companies were studied;
four with comprehensive health promotion programs and three
without. The four companies with programs had significantly
more positive changes related to organizational commitment,
supervision, working conditions, pay and fringe benefits and
job security.
Return on Investment
- Dupont reported that by the second year of their on-site fitness
and wellness program a $2.05 return was realized for every dollar
invested. In terms of reduction in absenteeism, an absolute
dollar savings figure of $1,596,877 was calculated.
- A U.S. study of Johnson and Johnson's on-site wellness program
shows a savings of $378 per employee due to decreased absenteeism
and medical benefit costs.
- Canada Life's Fitness and Lifestyle Program calculated a return
of $6.85 on each dollar invested. The main benefit items were
reduced employee turnover, greater productivity and reduced
medical insurance claims.
Return on Investment Ratios Estimated For
Corporate Fitness/Wellness/Health Programs
|
Study
|
Return on Investment
|
Company
|
Program Type
|
| Bernstein, (1986) |
1.95
|
NY Telephone |
Health Promotion |
| Browne, et al, (1984) |
1.91
|
Prudential Life |
Fitness Program |
| Damberg, (1989) |
3.63
|
Pilsbury |
Fitness Program |
| Gettman, (1986) |
1.07
|
Mesa Petroleum |
Fitness Program |
| Herd et al., (1987) |
2.16
|
ALLEF |
Wellness Program |
| McGinnis, (1980) |
3.00
|
Motorola |
Health Promotion |
| Reed et al, (1986) |
2.51
|
Indiana Blue Cross |
Health Promotion |
| Terborg, (1988) |
3.75
|
Coors' Beer |
Wellness Program |
Adapted From Shephard, 1992, Medicine and Science in Sports
and Exercise
|